![]() Problem is I don’t know whether to get the 0.5mm or 1mm variant. This significantly increases surface contact with a heatsink and improves cooling performance. With a 17. This line of thermal pads are much more effective than stock pads. ![]() These are custom cut to a smaller, more applicable size. ![]() They easily fit and adhere to most all shapes and sizes of components, including protrusions and recessed areas. The Fujipoly Ultra Extreme Thermal Pad is a ready to use high end thermal pad. I looked around and found the Alphacool Eisschicht self-adhering thermal pads 14 w/mK (17 too expensive) which I can buy at where I’m at. The new 13 Watt Sarcon® Thermal Gap Filler Pads are highly conformable and high heat-conducting gel materials in a versatile sheet form. The thermal adhesive paste provided by Arctic creates pretty much a permanent bond between the PCB and the heatsink which I don’t want. Meaning it’ll reveal all the VRAM/VRM and what not that normally are cooled by the front plate. I’ll have to remove the front plate of the 980 Ti to install the Accelero cooler. ![]() Specifically, I have an EVGA 980 Ti FTW ACX 2.0 4996 and an Arctic Accelero Xtreme III I want to slap on. I’m wondering when using self-adhesive thermal pads to stick tiny heatsinks on VRAM/VRM on a graphics card, does the thickness matter? Normally the thickness is determined by the gap between the two object squishing against each other, but since I’m just sticking heat sinks on the PCB, what thickness thermal pads should I use then? 0.5mm? 1mm? 1.5mm? First time posting here, please let me know if I did something wrong! ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |